Registered: 1392181657 Posts: 3
Reply with quote
I have an expensive duplex in downtown Anchorage and rent half of it for a very reasonable price. I discovered that there is damage to the siding by the tenant's front door. There were a few noticeable holes in the wood siding like someone was hitting the house with something sharp. I notified my tenant immediately, which was in October of 2013. She did not object and asked to arrange the repairs since she knows a lot of contractors. I did not mind and allowed her to do so. I figured she can save some money this way and also get someone reputable. We met with the contractor, got a bid for a replacement of a few peaces of siding, and moved forward. The contractor assured me that he will match the siding and I will never know that the damage was there. This was my main concern as I want to maintain the value of my property. However, the contractor acted carelessly. The measurements of the siding were not taken and the wood he delivered did not match. I disallowed the installation. The contractor agreed to find different wood and keep the price that he originally gave us. It is February now. The contractor provided three more samples of wood, none of them matched. The contractor said he considered every possibility on the wood and doesn't think he can complete the job, but now it is a mission for him to do it right. I took the initiative and found a few places out of state that can custom make the wood for me, but it will cost a lot more because of the set up fees for the equipment and shipping cost (probably 3-4 times more than the original bid). I also suggested to my tenant that she gets her deposit back since that contractor cannot complete the job, and I would hire someone else. My tenant said this is not reasonable and she will dispute any additional charges for the change in the contract and custom wood. She said she is willing to cover only up to the amount which was originally quoted. However, the bid had wrong assumptions that the contractor can use the wood that he has. The only way to do it right is to custom make the wood. My tenant also suggested patching the holes. I did not agree, because a few years from now I will end up with holes in the siding as the patching will not last. Besides, it would not look the same and will reduce the value of my property. My understanding is my tenant should bring the property back to the original condition (except for normal wear and tear, which is not the case here). She thinks I am not reasonable with repair expectations and may want to take the issue to court. I have her security deposit which should be enough to cover the damage, and I am planning to keep part of it to cover the cost of the repair to bring the property back to its original condition. Could anybody advise me on this situation? Also, what is reasonable and how would the court look at it? Thank you very much.
Registered: 1169270040 Posts: 3,809
Reply with quote
How large are these holes? Must be fairly large if you have to replace siding to fix them. If small, you could sand the wood, keep & stain the sawdust, mix it with clear wood glue, and fill the holes so it matches.
If large, and the wood can't be matched because they no longer have it, you need to be creative. Check with the building department or local fire department for homes to be demolished and have the contractor check those to find matching siding. Check with renovation companies to see if they ever remove that type of siding. Is there any way to cover the holes with decorative molding? I seriously doubt a judge would allow you to charge the tenant for set up and shipping. The wood siding wasn't new and you probably would only be allowed to charge her the depreciated price of it.
Registered: 1395901463 Posts: 4
Reply with quote
If you are feeling hectic from these clients and want a break from them then there is an option of
property management where you can easily hire them and they will collect monthly rentals themselves. __________________
Premier property management